Back
EN ISO 5167

How to choose a flow meter - which principle fits?

The right flow meter depends mainly on the medium and the required accuracy. This guide compares the key measuring principles - variable area, electromagnetic and ultrasonic - and explains what matters for accuracy, measuring range and installation.

5 minStand: 2026-07Geprüft: ESD specialists
View flow meters
3 principles
variable area, EMF, ultrasonic
±0.5-2 %
typical accuracy
>5 µS/cm
conductivity for EMF
10x DN
straight inlet run
Inhalt
  1. The measuring principles
  2. Principles compared
  3. Medium and range
  4. Installation and practice
  5. Frequently asked questions

Which measuring principles are there?

Flow meters measure the quantity of a liquid or gaseous medium per unit of time. The three most common principles are the variable area meter (mechanical), the electromagnetic method (EMF) and ultrasonic measurement. Each has its own strengths regarding medium, accuracy and installation.

The variable area flow meter (rotameter) shows the flow directly via the height of a float in a tapered tube - robust, low-cost and without auxiliary power. Electromagnetic devices use Faraday's law of induction and measure only conductive liquids with no pressure loss. Ultrasonic meters determine the transit-time difference of two acoustic signals and work non-invasively, some even as clamp-on units from outside the pipe.

Rule of thumb: conductive liquids like water or lye favour EMF, clean gases and liquids with simple on-site indication favour the variable area meter, and difficult or aggressive media without breaking the pipe favour ultrasonic.
Measurement and Testing

How to configure your instrument correctly for the job.

Read the guide

How do the principles differ in practice?

The key selection factors are medium, accuracy, pressure loss and price. The overview below summarises the typical properties.

  • Variable area: no auxiliary power, direct reading, but position-dependent (vertical installation, flow from bottom to top).
  • Electromagnetic: no pressure loss and no moving parts, but needs a minimum conductivity of about 5 µS/cm.
  • Ultrasonic clamp-on: retrofittable without interrupting the process, ideal for existing pipework.
  • Coriolis (additional option): also measures mass and density, but is considerably more expensive.
Watch the accuracy reference: of reading (of the actual value) is better than of full scale (of the scale maximum), because otherwise the error rises sharply in the lower part of the range.

What matters for medium and measuring range?

The medium decides the principle, the measuring range decides the size. Key factors are viscosity, conductivity, temperature, solids content and the expected flow rate in l/min or m³/h.

  • Check conductivity: below about 5 µS/cm (e.g. demineralised water, oils) the EMF technique is ruled out.
  • Solids and bubbles: for heavily contaminated media avoid transit-time ultrasonic and consider the Doppler principle instead.
  • Verify the temperature and pressure rating of seals and measuring tube - especially for heating and process water.
  • Size the range so the operating point sits at 40‑70 % of full scale, not at the edge.
Mind the turndown: a wide measuring range (e.g. 100:1 for EMF versus 10:1 for a variable area meter) lets one device measure small and large flows accurately.

What to consider during installation?

Installation often affects accuracy more than the device itself. A disturbed flow profile behind bends or valves distorts the reading, so defined inlet and outlet runs per EN ISO 5167 apply.

The measuring tube must be completely full. Installing in the rising pipe or a siphon prevents partial filling and air bubbles, which disturb EMF and ultrasonic in particular.
  • Observe the flow direction (arrow on the housing) during installation.
  • Avoid vibration and strong magnetic fields near the EMF meter.
  • After installation, perform a zero adjustment with the medium at rest.
  • Document calibration and inspection intervals, especially for billing-relevant measurement.

Frequently asked questions

Which flow meter is the most accurate?

For conductive liquids, electromagnetic meters offer the highest accuracy at ±0.2 to 0.5 % of reading. Coriolis mass flow meters are even more precise but considerably more expensive.

Can I retrofit a flow meter without cutting the pipe?

Yes, ultrasonic clamp-on sensors are strapped onto the existing line from outside and measure non-invasively with no process interruption. This is well suited to retrofitting.

Why does an EMF meter not work with oil or pure water?

The electromagnetic principle needs an electrically conductive liquid (roughly from 5 µS/cm). Oils and demineralised water conduct too poorly, so ultrasonic or variable area meters fit better.

How long must the straight inlet run be?

As a guide, allow about 5x DN before an EMF meter and 10x DN before an ultrasonic meter, with 3x to 5x DN downstream. Exact values follow EN ISO 5167 and the disturbance source.

Looking for the right flow meter?

We supply flow meters using variable area, EMF and ultrasonic principles - matched to medium, measuring range and accuracy.

Calibrated

Devices available with traceable calibration certificate.

All principles

Variable area, EMF and ultrasonic from one source.

Standards-compliant

Installation documented per EN ISO 5167.

Expert advice

Specialists help select the right device by medium.

More guides